Shit Tinted Glasses?? BBC Micro – Beebem Playing Fire Track

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Ok, I’ve heard of “Rose Tinted Glasses” a lot in the retro gaming world. Getting a chance to play an old game from your past on an emulator only to find that it was a pile of crap!! It leaves you wondering why yourself and everyone else went totally banzai over it!!

Well time for the old switcheroo….reverse rose tint! I had a quick play of “Fire Track” on BeebEm the other day and was amazed to find that it was a smooth acomplished lil shoot-em-up. From what I remember of playing it “In The Day” on my Beeb B it was gregariously couloured, jerky and generally left you with a headache and some travel sickness!!

Playing it on emulation was a pleasure, and I kept going back for another go! Most shmups on the Beeb were hideous affairs (Some exceptions!) but this lil fella kept me hooked…In fact i want another go right now!!

Kudos to BBC Micro B Fire Track. A kuul Shmup still worthy of todays attention!!!!!

Why is diagonal movement faster than straight movement in old arcade games / 8 bit computer games

I am talking bout real old skool games here, like early 80’s arcade stuff and old 8 bit computer games, but on a lot of them if you had a guy on the screen and you ran straight up, down, left or right you’d move slower than if you moved diagonally.

The issue sounds pretty odd but it’s easily answered and can be proved using Pythagoras Theorem.

If you push the left button, your guy on the screen moves 1 pixel to the left say, and if you push the up button your guy moves 1 pixel up the screen. Pretty straight forward yes.

Now if you push left and up at the same time then your guy moves up-left diagonally. This means he’s moved one pixel left and one pixel up in one move. The actual diagonal distance he’s travelled isn’t 1 pixel though, it’s actually just over 1.4 pixels, just like if you had a right angled triangle and the two shorter sides were 1 metre each then the hypotenuse would be just over 1.4 metres.

This means distance wise that every three straight the guy has travelled 3 pixels, but every three diagonal movements the guy has travelled over 4 pixels, hence why running diagonally gives you an advantage in old computer and arcade games, although usually the enemies had the same diagonal advantage too.

How to fix it? Well when you move diagonally, instead of shifting the guy one to the left and one up, shift him 0.7 to the left and 0.7 up and this will make the hypotenuse about 1. Of course ths screen itself can only display in whole pixels and will round up but as long as you don’t round up the actual x and y co-ordinates of the guy then he’ll skip a move every so often which slows him down to normal pace.

So why wasn’t this built into old arcade and computer games….Well there are three possible reasons:

1. It just wasn’t noticed to start with. (Unlikely)
2. It was noticed but people couldn’t be arsed to add the extra code to make it right.
3. Due to limited memory, there wasn’t enough space to add the additional code so programers just lived with it.